feedback
Home

Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes


BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY - HAWAII SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM

 

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

 

LAST COMPLETED ON MAY 12th, 2016

 

Form AS4 (B) Duplicate and expand as needed.  Provide table(s) to support self -study narrative addressing the accreditation standards below.

This form is used to assist the COA in the evaluation of the program’s compliance with the accreditation standards below:

4.0.2    The program provides summary data and outcomes for the assessment of each of its competencies, identifying the percentage of students achieving the benchmark.

4.0.4   The program uses Form AS 4 (B) and/or AS4 (M) to report assessment outcomes to its constituents and the public on its website and routinely up-dates (minimally every 2 years) these postings

 

All Council on Social Work Education programs measure and report student learning outcomes.  Students are assessed on their mastery of the competencies that comprise the accreditation standards of the Council on Social Work Education. These competencies are dimensions of social work practice that all social workers are expected to master during their professional training. A measurement benchmark is set by the social work programs for each competency. An assessment score at or above that benchmark is considered by the program to represent mastery of that particular competency.  

 

COMPETENCY

COMPETENCY BENCHMARK

PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK

 

 

 

Identify as a Professional Social Worker

80%

91.9%

Apply Ethical Principles

80%

92.8%

Apply Critical Thinking

80%

87.9%

Engage Diversity in Practice

80%

95.1%

Advance Human Rights/ Social and Economic Justice

80%

88.9%

Engage Research Informed Practice/ Practice Informed Research

80%

76.7%

Apply Human Behavior Knowledge

80%

84.4%

Engage Policy Practice to Advance Well-Being and Deliver Services

80%

91.1%

Respond to Practice Contexts

80%

85.3%

Practice Engagement

80%

95.3%

Practice Assessment

80%

90.6%

Practice Intervention

80%

90.8%

Practice Evaluation

80%

83.1%